Importance Of The Active Surveillance System †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Importance Of The Active Surveillance System. Answer: Response to the post on implementing an active surveillance program The given post succinctly presents the importance of the active surveillance system. Active surveillance was initially given less preference as it requires more resources. To identify the possible cases there is need of effective communication between the health departments and the health care providers. There is also a need of accurate information from the laboratories on specific disease (Gilbert and Cliffe 2016). It is evident from the post that active surveillance is better than the passive surveillance. The active surveillance was able to decrease the MRSA infection in the facility. The post was well supported with the relevant reference. The proposal for active surveillance with decolonization of MRSA in selected settings, such as for patients undergoing hemodialysis and surgery may hold significant economic value. As per Zacharioudakis, et al. (2014), when compared to the general population, the incidence of MSA infection 100 fold high among the dialysis patient. In the study by Lee et al. (2011), the haemodialysis patientsfor the methicillin resistantStaphylococcus aureus was subjected to the routine periodic testing and the economic value was determined. As per the results showed that the periodic testing in the selected setting may be the cost-effective strategy if there is is wide range of prevalence. It might be effective over the broad range of decolonization success rates. In similar study by Goldsack et al. (2014), the cost impact of performing the active surveillance on patients with positive MRSA. The study was conducted on patients admitted to seven medical-surgical units. The findings of the paper supported the evidence that targeting such patients with history of MRSA has the potential to improve otherwise placing them in isolation. The results showed that there is potential to reduce the cost and increase patient experience. References Gilbert, R. and Cliffe, S.J., 2016. Public Health Surveillance. InPublic Health Intelligence(pp. 91-110). Springer International Publishing. Goldsack, J.C., DeRitter, C., Power, M., Spencer, A., Taylor, C.L., Kim, S.F., Kirk, R. and Drees, M., 2014. Clinical, patient experience and cost impacts of performing active surveillance on known methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus positive patients admitted to medical-surgical units.American journal of infection control,42(10), pp.1039-1043. Lee, B.Y., Song, Y., McGlone, S.M., Bailey, R.R., Feura, J.M., Tai, J.H.Y., Lewis, G.J., Wiringa, A.E., Smith, K.J., Muder, R.R. and Harrison, L.H., 2011. The economic value of screening haemodialysis patients for methicillin?resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the USA.Clinical Microbiology and Infection,17(11), pp.1717-1726. Zacharioudakis, I.M., Zervou, F.N., Ziakas, P.D. and Mylonakis, E., 2014. Meta-analysis of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization and risk of infection in dialysis patients.